Decision tools portfolio.
How do we change the conditions under which poor decisions happen?
Three organisations. Three different industries. Three different sets of traps. But the same underlying logic: the people didn't change. The conditions around their decisions did.
This is what a decision toolkit actually does. Not fix individuals in isolation, but change the environment in which individuals decide: the way problems get framed, the way information enters the room, the way dissent is handled, the way habits get built and reinforced over time.
You've already seen these tools in action across the three stories. Now let's look at them directly: what each one is, how it works, and how you can start using it in your own work.
What follows is a set of those tools, organised across the three layers where decisions actually happen.
How you reason. Tools for correcting your own judgment before you commit, structuring problems, testing assumptions. These are the ones you use alone, at your desk, or with your core team, before a decision gets anywhere near a meeting room.
-
reframing: xxx
-
outside view (base rates + experrts, then inside view)
-
Flipping sides
How you reason with others. Tools for making group decisions that are genuinely better than what any individual would reach alone. Not just better meetings, but better structures for how information enters the room, how disagreement is handled, and how commitment is reached.
-
Structured Group Elicitation: requiring written input before any discussion begins — not just for brainstorming, as we covered earlier, but for any meeting where a judgment or evaluation is being made. The moment you let the first voice set the anchor, the collective intelligence in the room shrinks.
How your environment lets you reason. Tools for designing the conditions around decisions so that good process becomes the default rather than the exception.
-
incentive alignment audit: xxx
-
Psychological safety
-
checklists
These examples are drawn from a set of fifty. The goal of this toolkit isn't to cure any single bias. It's to become the kind of thinker and the kind of team that biases find it harder to take hold in.
The full toolkit, with each tool mapped to the traps it addresses and the contexts where it applies, is available as part of the Decision Toolkit.
[Product link]
Case studies tend to come from large organisations. But lots of small organisations are using these evidence-based approaches to improve their process and outcomes.
These examples are drawn from a set of fifty. The goal of this toolkit isn't to cure any single bias. It's to become the kind of thinker and the kind of team that biases find it harder to take hold in.
The full toolkit, with each tool mapped to the traps it addresses and the contexts where it applies, is available as part of the Decision Toolkit.
[Product link]



